Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
physical memory on computer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hintzyboy" data-source="post: 5721159" data-attributes="member: 566521"><p>Please show me where I once mentioned XP. Go ahead, I'll wait....</p><p></p><p>Can't find it? Must be because I suggested Win7, not XP. 7 IS superior to Vista in just about every way. It is faster, more stable, and vastly easier to use.</p><p></p><p>Although, there are many many people who would disagree with your implication that Vista is superior to XP. XP is still faster (including better multi-core support than both Vista and Win7), uses less resources,and lacks annoying pop-up dialogue boxes. Seeing as the only upgrade I noticed in Vista was aesthetics, I consider it a waste of time. If it comes on your machine, and you only use it for normal, casual computing, Vista is perfectly livable, especially since the release of SP1. But given the choice, I would go Win7&gt;XP&gt;Vista. I certainly wouldn't spend the money to switch any of my computers over.</p><p></p><p>And seeing as Microsoft will be releasing Windows 7 just 2.5 years after Vista, it would seem that very few people share your train of thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hintzyboy, post: 5721159, member: 566521"] Please show me where I once mentioned XP. Go ahead, I'll wait.... Can't find it? Must be because I suggested Win7, not XP. 7 IS superior to Vista in just about every way. It is faster, more stable, and vastly easier to use. Although, there are many many people who would disagree with your implication that Vista is superior to XP. XP is still faster (including better multi-core support than both Vista and Win7), uses less resources,and lacks annoying pop-up dialogue boxes. Seeing as the only upgrade I noticed in Vista was aesthetics, I consider it a waste of time. If it comes on your machine, and you only use it for normal, casual computing, Vista is perfectly livable, especially since the release of SP1. But given the choice, I would go Win7>XP>Vista. I certainly wouldn't spend the money to switch any of my computers over. And seeing as Microsoft will be releasing Windows 7 just 2.5 years after Vista, it would seem that very few people share your train of thought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
physical memory on computer?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list