Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Phase and T/A Question(s)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zako" data-source="post: 8023930" data-attributes="member: 629735"><p>IMO.. this is a fantastic topic to discuss. I'll try to provide my limited knowledge. First, time alignment will not necessarily correct all phase issues. Let's say you have a couple of speakers (say tweeter and woofer from one side, or one woofer and subwoofer) and a phase shift is introduced by a crossover network. Let's say all frequencies are now 90 degrees out of phase between the speakers. You can't always put ALL frequencies back in phase by the means of time alignment alone. This is because different frequencies have different wave lengths. So, a 90 degree shift means different wave lengths at different frequencies. You cannot apply time delay to one frequency but not another. TA is applied to the entire frequency spectrum. However, this does not seem to be such a big limitation for time alignment. Let's say you're time aligning a woofer with a subwoofer. These two speakers play equally loud only in a very narrow band of frequencies, and therefore TA is still useful for putting these two speakers roughly in phase just for the frequencies where they interact, since we don't care if two speakers are out of phase at the frequencies where they don't interact with each other (extreme case.. your tweeter out of phase with subwoofer, do you care?). One conclusion from this discussion is that if you want to avoid phase alignment issues, try to avoid using shallow slopes. If you use shallow slopes, then the range of frequencies where two speakers can interact with each other will be wider. If I get bored enough, I'll throw together a few graphs to show what I mean.</p><p></p><p>Note that this "limitation" does not apply to a situation where the acoustic phase shift is introduced by mechanically moving away the drivers. In this case, TA can correct phase issues in the entire spectrum, in theory.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Just to be a little pedantic here.. there is electrical phase and mechanical phase. I would prefer to call the later, the acoustic phase. When you swap negative and positive wire connections, you alter the electrical phase, and this also affects the acoustics phase. But, if you move the tweeter away from the woofer, then you affect the acoustic phase, but not electrical phase.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Are they?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think flipping the phase of the mid was an old school way of getting better imaging without time alignment. Normally you expect the left and right woofer to be in electrical phase. However, in a car environment the sound waves are not in acoustic phase. This is because the distances between you and woofers are different. When you couldn't change time alignment, you could flip the phase of one of the woofers. This would hopefully put the frequencies that are critical to imaging in better acoustic phase than they used to be. However, this way the bass frequencies will now definitely be out of phase. This is because the wave lengths at bass frequencies are very long. For example, at 80Hz the wave lenth is what ~4 meters long? This means that the fact that the left speaker is a few inches closer to your head than the right speaker, does not really affect the phase in an audible way to those frequencies. However, if you flip the phase of the woofer, you will definitely introduce a phase shift at this frequency that's very close to 180 degrees. Suddenly, the bass from left and right speakers nearly cancels each other. So this was often exploited in SQ installs this way.. the mids are phase flipped to keep the midrange closer to being in phase for better imaging. Since this affects bass, you effectively need another set of woofers just for playing bass. Now, whether flipping the phase of woofer and tweeter makes any audible difference at all will depend on the crossover frequency and the crossover slopes. If the crossover frequency between tweeter and woofer is high enough, then the wave lengths at those frequencies may be so short that the acoustic phase can not be effectively heard by ear. (e.g. there is no point to align frequencies with wave length so short that they will be out of acoustic phase again if you move your seat forward by 1 inch or turn your head). On the other hand, if the crossover frequency between woofer and tweeter is low enough or if the slopes are shallow, then flipping the phase of tweeters may affect what you hear.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zako, post: 8023930, member: 629735"] IMO.. this is a fantastic topic to discuss. I'll try to provide my limited knowledge. First, time alignment will not necessarily correct all phase issues. Let's say you have a couple of speakers (say tweeter and woofer from one side, or one woofer and subwoofer) and a phase shift is introduced by a crossover network. Let's say all frequencies are now 90 degrees out of phase between the speakers. You can't always put ALL frequencies back in phase by the means of time alignment alone. This is because different frequencies have different wave lengths. So, a 90 degree shift means different wave lengths at different frequencies. You cannot apply time delay to one frequency but not another. TA is applied to the entire frequency spectrum. However, this does not seem to be such a big limitation for time alignment. Let's say you're time aligning a woofer with a subwoofer. These two speakers play equally loud only in a very narrow band of frequencies, and therefore TA is still useful for putting these two speakers roughly in phase just for the frequencies where they interact, since we don't care if two speakers are out of phase at the frequencies where they don't interact with each other (extreme case.. your tweeter out of phase with subwoofer, do you care?). One conclusion from this discussion is that if you want to avoid phase alignment issues, try to avoid using shallow slopes. If you use shallow slopes, then the range of frequencies where two speakers can interact with each other will be wider. If I get bored enough, I'll throw together a few graphs to show what I mean. Note that this "limitation" does not apply to a situation where the acoustic phase shift is introduced by mechanically moving away the drivers. In this case, TA can correct phase issues in the entire spectrum, in theory. Just to be a little pedantic here.. there is electrical phase and mechanical phase. I would prefer to call the later, the acoustic phase. When you swap negative and positive wire connections, you alter the electrical phase, and this also affects the acoustics phase. But, if you move the tweeter away from the woofer, then you affect the acoustic phase, but not electrical phase. Are they? I think flipping the phase of the mid was an old school way of getting better imaging without time alignment. Normally you expect the left and right woofer to be in electrical phase. However, in a car environment the sound waves are not in acoustic phase. This is because the distances between you and woofers are different. When you couldn't change time alignment, you could flip the phase of one of the woofers. This would hopefully put the frequencies that are critical to imaging in better acoustic phase than they used to be. However, this way the bass frequencies will now definitely be out of phase. This is because the wave lengths at bass frequencies are very long. For example, at 80Hz the wave lenth is what ~4 meters long? This means that the fact that the left speaker is a few inches closer to your head than the right speaker, does not really affect the phase in an audible way to those frequencies. However, if you flip the phase of the woofer, you will definitely introduce a phase shift at this frequency that's very close to 180 degrees. Suddenly, the bass from left and right speakers nearly cancels each other. So this was often exploited in SQ installs this way.. the mids are phase flipped to keep the midrange closer to being in phase for better imaging. Since this affects bass, you effectively need another set of woofers just for playing bass. Now, whether flipping the phase of woofer and tweeter makes any audible difference at all will depend on the crossover frequency and the crossover slopes. If the crossover frequency between tweeter and woofer is high enough, then the wave lengths at those frequencies may be so short that the acoustic phase can not be effectively heard by ear. (e.g. there is no point to align frequencies with wave length so short that they will be out of acoustic phase again if you move your seat forward by 1 inch or turn your head). On the other hand, if the crossover frequency between woofer and tweeter is low enough or if the slopes are shallow, then flipping the phase of tweeters may affect what you hear. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Phase and T/A Question(s)
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh