Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Frankensuby" data-source="post: 2539181" data-attributes="member: 569869">It&#039;s all in the taste //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifI ran rear fill, at same wattage per speaker as the front (70 rms).&nbsp; I&#039;d suggest running the rear channels at about 20% less power than the front, or, if you have a head unit that has auto adjustment, run them full power, and let the deck time adjust and all that jazz (higher end pioneers have this, it is awesome.)Either way, I&#039;m happy I ran rear fill.&nbsp; I tried without it and I didn&#039;t like the sound.Anyways, I&#039;d imagine that the PG comps are a great bang for buck component.&nbsp; I wish I would have gotten these rather than the Type-R&#039;s, which I&#039;m not satisfied with.At the price they are it&#039;s not a large loss, and you can always turn around and sell them right away and not lose much at all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Frankensuby, post: 2539181, member: 569869"] It's all in the taste [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] I ran rear fill, at same wattage per speaker as the front (70 rms). I'd suggest running the rear channels at about 20% less power than the front, or, if you have a head unit that has auto adjustment, run them full power, and let the deck time adjust and all that jazz (higher end pioneers have this, it is awesome.) Either way, I'm happy I ran rear fill. I tried without it and I didn't like the sound. Anyways, I'd imagine that the PG comps are a great bang for buck component. I wish I would have gotten these rather than the Type-R's, which I'm not satisfied with. At the price they are it's not a large loss, and you can always turn around and sell them right away and not lose much at all. [/QUOTE]

Verification