Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mattymatt" data-source="post: 8232568" data-attributes="member: 659477">So, I have a question that I have been trying to research for the past few weeks and haven&#039;t been able to find a definitive answer.&nbsp; Maybe someone here can give a coherent response.....I&#039;m building a box for (3) Infinity Kappa 100.9w&#039;s, sealed.&nbsp; The spec sheet calls for .75 cu. ft per sub, and I would like to oversize the box a little to 1) allow for a deeper, lower response&nbsp; 2) without using max wattage.What is going to happen, practically speaking, if I increase the volume to 1 cu. ft. or even 1.25 cu. ft per sub?Is there going to be a noticeable (negative) difference with either of those two options?&nbsp; I recognize that RMS may be affected, and the tightness may be affected, but noticeable?&nbsp; Has anyone experimented with this type of thing enough to give some wisdom here?Thanks in advance!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mattymatt, post: 8232568, member: 659477"] So, I have a question that I have been trying to research for the past few weeks and haven't been able to find a definitive answer. Maybe someone here can give a coherent response..... I'm building a box for (3) Infinity Kappa 100.9w's, sealed. The spec sheet calls for .75 cu. ft per sub, and I would like to oversize the box a little to 1) allow for a deeper, lower response 2) without using max wattage. What is going to happen, practically speaking, if I increase the volume to 1 cu. ft. or even 1.25 cu. ft per sub? Is there going to be a noticeable (negative) difference with either of those two options? I recognize that RMS may be affected, and the tightness may be affected, but noticeable? Has anyone experimented with this type of thing enough to give some wisdom here? Thanks in advance! [/QUOTE]

Verification