Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Savant" data-source="post: 208017" data-attributes="member: 546108">So, now all of a sudden, a week or so after the fact, they &#039;know&#039; the missle was launched over 150 Km when the initial guess was 102 Km at most? Hmm.. and they couldn&#039;t have moved the missles/launchers at any point.. Ok..I&#039;ll give you they may have found missles and launchers beyond the range, but show me how they know that&#039;s the only place any missles were (or could have been) launched from?The Sawhorse is the 140 Km variant... so 150-ish, while a stretch, is still understandable.. you say &#039;the distance traversed was beyond the legal range of 150 Km&#039;, but how far away are we taking? Did they find the missles/launcher at 500 km???? what? This is what I mean when I say I have a problem with how you present info.. Sure, the Sawhorse was modified and might well have gone 10,000 Km.. we don&#039;t know how far it went since you didn&#039;t say.. .. Also, as we discussed, you can&#039;t be A and B.. you are A OR B.. silkworm OR sawhorse.. to say they were silkworm missles, they were sawhorse missles.. is .. well.. ignorant.. we lable things for a reson in this world.. not so we can call one thing several names, or have several names for one thing that is different with each name but all the names are interchangable..They weren&#039;t disclosed.. Ok.. so? that&#039;s why we were inspecting //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifAnd, given your insistence on bringing up the bottle rocket thing AGAIN.. and I&#039;m gonna go on a limb here and suppose that the report did NOT say it, you only hurt your argument to anyone that is trying to pay attention... at least, when I see that kind of juvenile activity I immediately loose faith in what&#039;s said.. *shrug*So, where was this? I&#039;d like to read the report //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Savant, post: 208017, member: 546108"] So, now all of a sudden, a week or so after the fact, they 'know' the missle was launched over 150 Km when the initial guess was 102 Km at most? Hmm.. and they couldn't have moved the missles/launchers at any point.. Ok.. I'll give you they may have found missles and launchers beyond the range, but show me how they know that's the only place any missles were (or could have been) launched from? The Sawhorse is the 140 Km variant... so 150-ish, while a stretch, is still understandable.. you say 'the distance traversed was beyond the legal range of 150 Km', but how far away are we taking? Did they find the missles/launcher at 500 km???? what? This is what I mean when I say I have a problem with how you present info.. Sure, the Sawhorse was modified and might well have gone 10,000 Km.. we don't know how far it went since you didn't say.. .. Also, as we discussed, you can't be A and B.. you are A OR B.. silkworm OR sawhorse.. to say they were silkworm missles, they were sawhorse missles.. is .. well.. ignorant.. we lable things for a reson in this world.. not so we can call one thing several names, or have several names for one thing that is different with each name but all the names are interchangable.. They weren't disclosed.. Ok.. so? that's why we were inspecting [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] And, given your insistence on bringing up the bottle rocket thing AGAIN.. and I'm gonna go on a limb here and suppose that the report did NOT say it, you only hurt your argument to anyone that is trying to pay attention... at least, when I see that kind of juvenile activity I immediately loose faith in what's said.. *shrug* So, where was this? I'd like to read the report [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification