Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Opinions on best car set up..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeffdachef" data-source="post: 8640091" data-attributes="member: 650438"><p>nope, incorrect. that occurs when the manufacturer goes from a smaller sub to a bigger sub without increase motor strength to keep the TS parameters similar for similar performance. Its literally what you get with garbage tier woofers. With any properly made subwoofer brand, going from a 10-12-15-18-32 mainly affects output, does not affect punchiness or snappiness at all. That literally all enclosure and enclosure size/design is A LOT different when going up in sub size and takes a lot of work. Whatever you read is from a bunch of noobs that most likely used pre-fab ported boxes and dont know why their subs sound like complete sh*t. Pretty much the same people that say sealed boxes hit more notes than ported... complete noobs. As long as the sub is balanced with motor strength (BL) to moving mass ratio and their QES, QTS and QMS factors, it'll give the same punchiness at any size. You got people winning sound quality comps with 18s and 15s, its literally all in the install and tune.</p><p></p><p>for placement with best phasing in a trunk.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.caraudiojunkies.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=5145&amp;d=1467091545" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeffdachef, post: 8640091, member: 650438"] nope, incorrect. that occurs when the manufacturer goes from a smaller sub to a bigger sub without increase motor strength to keep the TS parameters similar for similar performance. Its literally what you get with garbage tier woofers. With any properly made subwoofer brand, going from a 10-12-15-18-32 mainly affects output, does not affect punchiness or snappiness at all. That literally all enclosure and enclosure size/design is A LOT different when going up in sub size and takes a lot of work. Whatever you read is from a bunch of noobs that most likely used pre-fab ported boxes and dont know why their subs sound like complete sh*t. Pretty much the same people that say sealed boxes hit more notes than ported... complete noobs. As long as the sub is balanced with motor strength (BL) to moving mass ratio and their QES, QTS and QMS factors, it'll give the same punchiness at any size. You got people winning sound quality comps with 18s and 15s, its literally all in the install and tune. for placement with best phasing in a trunk. [IMG]http://www.caraudiojunkies.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=5145&d=1467091545[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Opinions on best car set up..
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh