Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kingstroker" data-source="post: 8106631" data-attributes="member: 644892"><p>I&#039;m confused.&nbsp; So if you pay your insurance and in turn they pay for damages from the storm including cleanup then why shouldn&#039;t you get paid for helping clean up.&nbsp; It has or will be paid for through insurance premiums.&nbsp; The only thing the insurance doesn&#039;t pay for is sorting through your personal belongings.&nbsp; You just can&#039;t wonder into a neighborhood and start &quot;working&quot; if you aren&#039;t providing a specific service such as a volunteer through the Red Cross(must have a background check), have a dump truck and/or front end loader, boom truck.&nbsp; All of these services are paid for by the insurance companies except the Red Cross.&nbsp; Unless you live in the area and/or are there at the moment it happens and are digging survivors out of the rubble you have no business there, the police won&#039;t let you in.&nbsp; So is it wrong to provide a legitimate service and get paid for it?&nbsp; Both your arguments are pretty lame and makes the readers wonder if either one of them resemble the truth an any way.&nbsp; If I&#039;m wrong I apologize but running all over the country volunteering seems a little odd unless you are rich and bored.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Kingstroker, post: 8106631, member: 644892"] I'm confused. So if you pay your insurance and in turn they pay for damages from the storm including cleanup then why shouldn't you get paid for helping clean up. It has or will be paid for through insurance premiums. The only thing the insurance doesn't pay for is sorting through your personal belongings. You just can't wonder into a neighborhood and start "working" if you aren't providing a specific service such as a volunteer through the Red Cross(must have a background check), have a dump truck and/or front end loader, boom truck. All of these services are paid for by the insurance companies except the Red Cross. Unless you live in the area and/or are there at the moment it happens and are digging survivors out of the rubble you have no business there, the police won't let you in. So is it wrong to provide a legitimate service and get paid for it? Both your arguments are pretty lame and makes the readers wonder if either one of them resemble the truth an any way. If I'm wrong I apologize but running all over the country volunteering seems a little odd unless you are rich and bored. [/QUOTE]

Verification