Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="its_bacon12" data-source="post: 5492474" data-attributes="member: 558729">Resorting to name calling, classy.&nbsp; You call Panetta and ignorant reason?&nbsp; And Richardson for commerce?&nbsp; How about Geithner not paying taxes AND hiring an illegal immigrant?&nbsp; What about Holder who has defended a corporation THAT PLEAD GUILTY to abetting a national terrorist organization?&nbsp; Not to mention the insanely corrupt Chicago machine he came out of (Rev. Wright, Blagojevich, Rezko and other I&#039;m forgetting at the moment)...That doesn&#039;t even go into his economic policies which are VERY questionable in a time of recession.&nbsp; UCLA economists did a study that FDR&#039;s liberal policies, not unlike those of Obama&#039;s, caused the great depression to last ANOTHER 7 YEARS.&nbsp; You obviously don&#039;t have an understanding of macroeconomics or monetary and/or fiscal policies.I&#039;m sorry but I&#039;d like to stay alive with the policies Bush put in against terrorism.&nbsp; Obama with the nominees of Panetta and Holder will gut the military, and kill our defense and intelligence.&nbsp; But I guess you didn&#039;t care to educate yourself on that.Liberal media&#039;s influence as shown above.Say that about EVERY president that has engaged in war, then you might be making a fair statement, but stupid regardless.&nbsp; You seem to have forgot Clinton when he went into Kosovo for the same reasons.&nbsp; But again, I guess you didn&#039;t care to educate yourself on that either.I&#039;d rather have Hillary than Obama..&nbsp; She has more experience (see Bill Clinton) in dealing with presidential affairs.&nbsp; And to boot she&#039;s more centrist.&nbsp; And again resorting to name calling.&nbsp; You are a first class debater that can spell terrific.The best thing you&#039;ve said in this post is that you&#039;re not going to post again.&nbsp; Please save the time of embarrassing yourself</blockquote>

[QUOTE="its_bacon12, post: 5492474, member: 558729"] Resorting to name calling, classy. You call Panetta and ignorant reason? And Richardson for commerce? How about Geithner not paying taxes AND hiring an illegal immigrant? What about Holder who has defended a corporation THAT PLEAD GUILTY to abetting a national terrorist organization? Not to mention the insanely corrupt Chicago machine he came out of (Rev. Wright, Blagojevich, Rezko and other I'm forgetting at the moment)... That doesn't even go into his economic policies which are VERY questionable in a time of recession. UCLA economists did a study that FDR's liberal policies, not unlike those of Obama's, caused the great depression to last ANOTHER 7 YEARS. You obviously don't have an understanding of macroeconomics or monetary and/or fiscal policies. I'm sorry but I'd like to stay alive with the policies Bush put in against terrorism. Obama with the nominees of Panetta and Holder will gut the military, and kill our defense and intelligence. But I guess you didn't care to educate yourself on that. Liberal media's influence as shown above. Say that about EVERY president that has engaged in war, then you might be making a fair statement, but stupid regardless. You seem to have forgot Clinton when he went into Kosovo for the same reasons. But again, I guess you didn't care to educate yourself on that either. I'd rather have Hillary than Obama.. She has more experience (see Bill Clinton) in dealing with presidential affairs. And to boot she's more centrist. And again resorting to name calling. You are a first class debater that can spell terrific. The best thing you've said in this post is that you're not going to post again. Please save the time of embarrassing yourself [/QUOTE]

Verification