Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
***Official 2009-10 NFL THREAD***
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="misfit138" data-source="post: 6679371" data-attributes="member: 611275"><p>You'd have to be borderline retarded to say that Jackson is better than Favre, but Favre is old &amp; Jackson is young. Who's to say that we've seen the absolute best of Jackson, man? QBs sometimes take several years to become successful, and pivotal time has been taken away from Jackson at this point. Brett Favre is a plug in, man. He offers no long term solution at all. And it's real easy to say stuff like" Favre is one of the best in the league" when looking at stats, but there's more to football than stats. You saw what Brett Favre is, was and will continue to be tonight when the game was on the line. He had tons of daylght, but did he run with the ball? His team could've possibly made a game winning FG and punched their ticket to the big game, but did he throw the ball away? No, he threw a bad pass across his body right into the gut of a defender. Favre has ALWAYS been bad for that and no amount of him being "one of the best in the league" has ever stopped it.</p><p></p><p>But yeah, the Vikes were good this year. They were supposed to be good before Favre ever came into the picture...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="misfit138, post: 6679371, member: 611275"] You'd have to be borderline retarded to say that Jackson is better than Favre, but Favre is old & Jackson is young. Who's to say that we've seen the absolute best of Jackson, man? QBs sometimes take several years to become successful, and pivotal time has been taken away from Jackson at this point. Brett Favre is a plug in, man. He offers no long term solution at all. And it's real easy to say stuff like" Favre is one of the best in the league" when looking at stats, but there's more to football than stats. You saw what Brett Favre is, was and will continue to be tonight when the game was on the line. He had tons of daylght, but did he run with the ball? His team could've possibly made a game winning FG and punched their ticket to the big game, but did he throw the ball away? No, he threw a bad pass across his body right into the gut of a defender. Favre has ALWAYS been bad for that and no amount of him being "one of the best in the league" has ever stopped it. But yeah, the Vikes were good this year. They were supposed to be good before Favre ever came into the picture... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
***Official 2009-10 NFL THREAD***
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list