Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
***Offical 08/09 NBA thread!***
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rtillaree" data-source="post: 5750735" data-attributes="member: 570661"><p>it's god awful...it's the albatross for coaches, players and fans across the board...</p><p></p><p>If an umpire is allowing a pitcher to paint the corners of the strikezone, hitters can recognize that and adjust to it(as can the pitchers). If that particular umpire's strikezone is shifted a bit inside on right handed hitters, players can adjust to that as long as it's consistent in how it's being called for the entire game.</p><p></p><p>My problem with the reffing isn't that it's bad, or that it's different from ref to ref. Players can make adjustments based off how a game is being called early. If the officiating crew is calling the game close, and is calling touch fouls, players can adjust and be careful to avoid contact. If the officials are letting physical play go on early in the game, players can buckle down and play more physical. That's fine. I, as a fan, have no problem with either of those scenarios as long as it's consistent from the start of the game to the end, and is consistent on both ends of the floor.</p><p></p><p>What bothers me as a viewer is when the game isn't being called consistently. There should never be a moment where a ref seems to decide arbitrarily that it's time to start calling those fouls in the paint(or that it's time to decide to stop calling them, as the case may be). If in the eyes of the officials there wasn't enough contact on a play in the first 5 minutes of the game to warrant a foul call, then that same amount of contact shouldn't be a foul at any other point in the game either. For the same reason, if it was enough contact to be a foul 5 minutes into the game, it should always be a foul, regardless of what point of the game it is...</p><p></p><p>and this has nothing to do with yesterday's Cavs/Magic game, I'm not even complaining about that game, they let a lot of stuff fly for the bulk minutes in that one...it's every NBA game I watch, I watch a good 15 games a week or more (depending on ho many Orlando games there are) and it just baffles me...no wonder why the Tim Donaghy thing was so easy to pull off....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rtillaree, post: 5750735, member: 570661"] it's god awful...it's the albatross for coaches, players and fans across the board... If an umpire is allowing a pitcher to paint the corners of the strikezone, hitters can recognize that and adjust to it(as can the pitchers). If that particular umpire's strikezone is shifted a bit inside on right handed hitters, players can adjust to that as long as it's consistent in how it's being called for the entire game. My problem with the reffing isn't that it's bad, or that it's different from ref to ref. Players can make adjustments based off how a game is being called early. If the officiating crew is calling the game close, and is calling touch fouls, players can adjust and be careful to avoid contact. If the officials are letting physical play go on early in the game, players can buckle down and play more physical. That's fine. I, as a fan, have no problem with either of those scenarios as long as it's consistent from the start of the game to the end, and is consistent on both ends of the floor. What bothers me as a viewer is when the game isn't being called consistently. There should never be a moment where a ref seems to decide arbitrarily that it's time to start calling those fouls in the paint(or that it's time to decide to stop calling them, as the case may be). If in the eyes of the officials there wasn't enough contact on a play in the first 5 minutes of the game to warrant a foul call, then that same amount of contact shouldn't be a foul at any other point in the game either. For the same reason, if it was enough contact to be a foul 5 minutes into the game, it should always be a foul, regardless of what point of the game it is... and this has nothing to do with yesterday's Cavs/Magic game, I'm not even complaining about that game, they let a lot of stuff fly for the bulk minutes in that one...it's every NBA game I watch, I watch a good 15 games a week or more (depending on ho many Orlando games there are) and it just baffles me...no wonder why the Tim Donaghy thing was so easy to pull off.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
***Offical 08/09 NBA thread!***
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list