Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rtillaree" data-source="post: 5231775" data-attributes="member: 570661">yea, flagrant, but not on the basis of intent, unnecessary sure but that is only because of the force Shaq vs. Stuckey, I mean on any playing field Stuckey will get hurt...it should be reduced to a flagrant 1, and it probably will be once Nunn and Jackson review it.  His arms we're up when he leaped in the direction of Stuckey, he didn't attack the head, neck or body, his hands are moving in the direction of the ball which shows intention to stop the ball, and as clearly outlined in 12B-Section IV of the NBA handbook, that's legal.as for not leaving the court, and then fighting with Nash and Porter, that's a bit inexcusable...luckily Stuckey is alright...</blockquote>

Top