Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
North American Union? F*ck that
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhoSayWho?" data-source="post: 4269182" data-attributes="member: 568804"><p>Why should I look at the whackos "scientific" evidence? I am in no way qualified in physics, engineering, metallurgy or the numerous other branches of science that it would take to determine exactly why the buildings collapsed in the manner that they did. I will take a wild guess and suggest that you are not either.</p><p></p><p>What I have been able to determine through our discussion in areas that I am familiar in is that you will argue with great conviction about matters that you know absolutely about. Even when you should realize that you are wrong it takes someone beating you over the head before you can realize that you have been duped by the whackos.</p><p></p><p>I am sure there are many issues that I could go over with you. But frankly, you just do not catch on quickly enough. I do not have the patience to teach you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhoSayWho?, post: 4269182, member: 568804"] Why should I look at the whackos "scientific" evidence? I am in no way qualified in physics, engineering, metallurgy or the numerous other branches of science that it would take to determine exactly why the buildings collapsed in the manner that they did. I will take a wild guess and suggest that you are not either. What I have been able to determine through our discussion in areas that I am familiar in is that you will argue with great conviction about matters that you know absolutely about. Even when you should realize that you are wrong it takes someone beating you over the head before you can realize that you have been duped by the whackos. I am sure there are many issues that I could go over with you. But frankly, you just do not catch on quickly enough. I do not have the patience to teach you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
North American Union? F*ck that
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
