Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 1535595" data-attributes="member: 555320">No one ever said this amplifier doesn&#039;t have enough power to play music.&nbsp; Heck, with it&#039;s current draw it&#039;s still good for around 4kw of actual continuous power ouptut.&nbsp; That&#039;s still a heck of a lot of power for a 4-channel amplifier.But, is it really capable of 15,000w &quot;continuously&quot;.....the answer is no, it&#039;s not.&nbsp; And, henceforth, really shouldn&#039;t be labeled a 15kw &quot;RMS&quot; amplifier.&nbsp; That is what werewold was trying to get across.&nbsp; The RF tech kept coming up with pretty little sugar coated explainations (IMO, atleast), like wanting to talk about &quot;music power&quot;.If they want to talk about &quot;music power&quot;...we might aswell start using peak power ratings as a basis for comparison aswell.&nbsp; They&#039;re essentially the same thing.As interesting a technology as it is.....I still fear the day that this techology enters the mass consumer market.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 1535595, member: 555320"] No one ever said this amplifier doesn't have enough power to play music. Heck, with it's current draw it's still good for around 4kw of actual continuous power ouptut. That's still a heck of a lot of power for a 4-channel amplifier. But, is it really capable of 15,000w "continuously".....the answer is no, it's not. And, henceforth, really shouldn't be labeled a 15kw "RMS" amplifier. [I]That[/I] is what werewold was trying to get across. The RF tech kept coming up with pretty little sugar coated explainations (IMO, atleast), like wanting to talk about "music power". If they want to talk about "music power"...we might aswell start using peak power ratings as a basis for comparison aswell. They're essentially the same thing. As [I]interesting[/I] a technology as it is.....I still fear the day that this techology enters the mass consumer market. [/QUOTE]

Verification