Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HitManSE" data-source="post: 3636459" data-attributes="member: 549624">I see. I think we&#039;ve all come to the conclusion that Goob is a ***. Pretty much an understatement.Couldnt tell you, thats why im currently running an AMD 5600+. Its more then enough performance to meet any of my needs and I dont plan on overclocking this PC. So far its fast, reliable, runs very cool (high 20&#039;s to low 30 and never seen a temp above 41) and quiet. There are however diehard Intel fans, just as much as there are those that prefer AMD.No argument about Intel as a company, 100% agreed.True. Personally I wouldnt bother buying anything under the 6750 and thats IF I was planning to OC.True again. I found that out the hard way //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif 3.37-3.48 GB is what my system reads, stuck on a 32-bit Vista though. I guess with Ram being as cheap as is it, might as well get 4 GB, be it a 64-bit OS or not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HitManSE, post: 3636459, member: 549624"] I see. I think we've all come to the conclusion that Goob is a ***. Pretty much an understatement. Couldnt tell you, thats why im currently running an AMD 5600+. Its more then enough performance to meet any of my needs and I dont plan on overclocking this PC. So far its fast, reliable, runs very cool (high 20's to low 30 and never seen a temp above 41) and quiet. There are however diehard Intel fans, just as much as there are those that prefer AMD. No argument about Intel as a company, 100% agreed. True. Personally I wouldnt bother buying anything under the 6750 and thats IF I was planning to OC. True again. I found that out the hard way [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] 3.37-3.48 GB is what my system reads, stuck on a 32-bit Vista though. I guess with Ram being as cheap as is it, might as well get 4 GB, be it a 64-bit OS or not. [/QUOTE]

Verification