Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="myvanpounds" data-source="post: 3634000" data-attributes="member: 545592">having to change a letter from C to D EVERY time you want to install something is a waste of precious time on this earth..... much like having to type up this postthe hard fact is you can only get faster than my setup if you used 2 raptors in raid 0I personally really dont give a crap about data securityhaving a 10k OS drive and a 7200rpm storage drive is pointless performance wise since the os would still load slower than 2 7200&#039;s or 10k&#039;s in raid 0, and the files on the storage drive would take a long time to access since they are on a 7200 drive,&nbsp; only benifit from that setup is data security.... but you have to give up performance for itanyway you look at it 2x500GB 7200&#039;s in raid 0 is the best comprimise between speed, cost and storage right now at around 20cents per GB,&nbsp; you can get faster with 2x160Gb raptors but you lose storage space and it is less cost efficient at 1.45 per Gb ... this is of course assuming one does not care about data security</blockquote>

[QUOTE="myvanpounds, post: 3634000, member: 545592"] having to change a letter from C to D EVERY time you want to install something is a waste of precious time on this earth..... much like having to type up this post the hard fact is you can only get faster than my setup if you used 2 raptors in raid 0 I personally really dont give a crap about data security having a 10k OS drive and a 7200rpm storage drive is pointless performance wise since the os would still load slower than 2 7200's or 10k's in raid 0, and the files on the storage drive would take a long time to access since they are on a 7200 drive, only benifit from that setup is data security.... but you have to give up performance for it anyway you look at it 2x500GB 7200's in raid 0 is the best comprimise between speed, cost and storage right now at around 20cents per GB, you can get faster with 2x160Gb raptors but you lose storage space and it is less cost efficient at 1.45 per Gb ... this is of course assuming one does not care about data security [/QUOTE]

Verification