Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="konechiwa" data-source="post: 2675766" data-attributes="member: 568044">the type R&#039;s are completely different to me. My friend has type S components (he says he likes them, go figure) but they kill them.The tweeters are probably the biggest imrovment, because now they actually sound...well, good. Not to harsh, and clear. Good punch on midbass, and it&#039;s pretty accurate. It&#039;s a very good speaker for the money IMO. Crossover&#039;s a TINY so they&#039;d fit almost anywhere..Haven&#039;t heard the crystals or type X&#039;s. I have the polk momo&#039;s your talking about. Their good, accurate, but the tweeter is harsh for silk. Good punch for midbass, but to me it sounded like a &quot;wall of sound&quot;. Seperation just wasn&#039;t present. I should have looked around before i purchased them. Not a bad speaker, but not the best. It was just to...soft.Bestbuy has the new type R&#039;s, and i think you should at least give them a listen before you decide on something else.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="konechiwa, post: 2675766, member: 568044"] the type R's are completely different to me. My friend has type S components (he says he likes them, go figure) but they kill them. The tweeters are probably the biggest imrovment, because now they actually sound...well, good. Not to harsh, and clear. Good punch on midbass, and it's pretty accurate. It's a very good speaker for the money IMO. Crossover's a TINY so they'd fit almost anywhere.. Haven't heard the crystals or type X's. I have the polk momo's your talking about. Their good, accurate, but the tweeter is harsh for silk. Good punch for midbass, but to me it sounded like a "wall of sound". Seperation just wasn't present. I should have looked around before i purchased them. Not a bad speaker, but not the best. It was just to...soft. Bestbuy has the new type R's, and i think you should at least give them a listen before you decide on something else. [/QUOTE]

Verification