Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rudy" data-source="post: 5133413" data-attributes="member: 568035">I&#039;ll probably get a measurement mic at some point and maybe redo it all. The funny thing is that the results were so obvious as to almost be ridiculous. I know people love graphs and numbers, so even if the methodology is completely bogus, pretty pictures will convince at least some people otherwise //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifI think we get pretty close to no viscoelasticity with the asphalt P&amp;amp;S. In terms of mass, 58 grams of DX deadened the panel. It took 135 grams of P&amp;amp;S not match the DX (and V-Max, Damplifier and Damp Pro) results. If mass was the main benefit, 68 grams (2 squares) of P&amp;amp;S should have performed at least as well as the DX and it wasn&#039;t even close.The eDead pretty much fills the butyl/no foil slot since its Mylar contains a microscopically thin layer of foil sandwiched in some sort of foil. The eDead adhesive is very close in consistency to the adhesives of the much better performing products. It took 136 grams of eDead (3 squares) before the RF dropped to a point where I didn&#039;t feel I could make an objective comparison but could still hear sustained resonance.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rudy, post: 5133413, member: 568035"] I'll probably get a measurement mic at some point and maybe redo it all. The funny thing is that the results were so obvious as to almost be ridiculous. I know people love graphs and numbers, so even if the methodology is completely bogus, pretty pictures will convince at least some people otherwise [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] I think we get pretty close to no viscoelasticity with the asphalt P&S. In terms of mass, 58 grams of DX deadened the panel. It took 135 grams of P&S not match the DX (and V-Max, Damplifier and Damp Pro) results. If mass was the main benefit, 68 grams (2 squares) of P&S should have performed at least as well as the DX and it wasn't even close. The eDead pretty much fills the butyl/no foil slot since its Mylar contains a microscopically thin layer of foil sandwiched in some sort of foil. The eDead adhesive is very close in consistency to the adhesives of the much better performing products. It took 136 grams of eDead (3 squares) before the RF dropped to a point where I didn't feel I could make an objective comparison but could still hear sustained resonance. [/QUOTE]

Verification