Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deiimos" data-source="post: 8890180" data-attributes="member: 682903">Yes I see it is an old thread....I liked MTX and the older ones would do rated power as far as I&#039;ve seen, but the 2200x is a 400w amp and not very big, class AB to boot, I bet 400 to 450 watts would be in its real ballpark output right at the edge of clipping. The 2300x was bigger amp, the Dyno video shows it easily did over rated at 850+ watts (rated at like 600), but I highly doubt the 2200x would do 850, it’s a much smaller amp in the Road Thunder line.Tony D was behind designing the amp dyno so I feel pretty confident it’s pretty accurate and the MTX amps always seem to Dyno above rated. I had a bunch of the smaller MTX amps back in the day that did great, and a 6500D and the bigger 1501D and all performed really well. That 1501D from 2002 was a beast for a 1000w rated amp, although small by today’s standards.That said, I agree that the 2200x no way does 850 watts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deiimos, post: 8890180, member: 682903"] Yes I see it is an old thread.... I liked MTX and the older ones would do rated power as far as I've seen, but the 2200x is a 400w amp and not very big, class AB to boot, I bet 400 to 450 watts would be in its real ballpark output right at the edge of clipping. The 2300x was bigger amp, the Dyno video shows it easily did over rated at 850+ watts (rated at like 600), but I highly doubt the 2200x would do 850, it’s a much smaller amp in the Road Thunder line. Tony D was behind designing the amp dyno so I feel pretty confident it’s pretty accurate and the MTX amps always seem to Dyno above rated. I had a bunch of the smaller MTX amps back in the day that did great, and a 6500D and the bigger 1501D and all performed really well. That 1501D from 2002 was a beast for a 1000w rated amp, although small by today’s standards. That said, I agree that the 2200x no way does 850 watts. [/QUOTE]

Verification