Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Miscellaneous Automotive
Car Electronics & Appearance
Car Performance & Repair
MPG: Speed vs. Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IrTehL33T@DBeez" data-source="post: 2028729" data-attributes="member: 568276"><p>theres no need to get complicated, its just a matter of if the engine in the vehicle of choice uses constant ratio of fuel throughout rpm range. if you were to look at the fuel mapping, determine rpm points at which each speed will match with in top gear, along with the same load input, you can determine how much fuel is being consumed and then use that quantity to go take into consideration with the time difference.</p><p></p><p>some fuel maps are rather rich in the lower rpms which could actually mean that in a high geared 5th or 6th at 65, you're revving so low that you would actually lean out a little bit by accelerating to 80 and getting the revs up to a leaner a/f ratio, and possibly require less of a load to maintain speed because of powerband... in which case the fuel consumption may actually decrease.</p><p></p><p>its all going to depend on the specific vehicle's tuning data and its gear ratios</p><p></p><p>although, this entire theory doesn deplete the consideration of drag coefficient, it would have to be considered an idealistic theoretical calculation</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IrTehL33T@DBeez, post: 2028729, member: 568276"] theres no need to get complicated, its just a matter of if the engine in the vehicle of choice uses constant ratio of fuel throughout rpm range. if you were to look at the fuel mapping, determine rpm points at which each speed will match with in top gear, along with the same load input, you can determine how much fuel is being consumed and then use that quantity to go take into consideration with the time difference. some fuel maps are rather rich in the lower rpms which could actually mean that in a high geared 5th or 6th at 65, you're revving so low that you would actually lean out a little bit by accelerating to 80 and getting the revs up to a leaner a/f ratio, and possibly require less of a load to maintain speed because of powerband... in which case the fuel consumption may actually decrease. its all going to depend on the specific vehicle's tuning data and its gear ratios although, this entire theory doesn deplete the consideration of drag coefficient, it would have to be considered an idealistic theoretical calculation [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Miscellaneous Automotive
Car Electronics & Appearance
Car Performance & Repair
MPG: Speed vs. Time
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list