Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Miscellaneous Automotive
Car Electronics & Appearance
Car Performance & Repair
MPG: Speed vs. Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bikinpunk" data-source="post: 2027891" data-attributes="member: 568114"><p>In a real world situation, yes, you have to consider all sorts of elements that you can't control. I totally agree, but for sake of this argument. If you broke it down into simply constant speed with no variations in speed and took 2 speeds I'd like to know the results.</p><p></p><p>I suppose if you had a good open stretch of highway and started with a full tank and went for a few miles, maybe 10-20 to make it worth it. I dunno, I guess there's no point in arguing it because conditions will hardly ever be ideal. It's just something I've wondered. considering drag is relative to the velocity^2, the force on your car is increased much more at faster speeds. I'm to the point where I'm tired of talking about this, haha. At least some of you understood what I was saying.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bikinpunk, post: 2027891, member: 568114"] In a real world situation, yes, you have to consider all sorts of elements that you can't control. I totally agree, but for sake of this argument. If you broke it down into simply constant speed with no variations in speed and took 2 speeds I'd like to know the results. I suppose if you had a good open stretch of highway and started with a full tank and went for a few miles, maybe 10-20 to make it worth it. I dunno, I guess there's no point in arguing it because conditions will hardly ever be ideal. It's just something I've wondered. considering drag is relative to the velocity^2, the force on your car is increased much more at faster speeds. I'm to the point where I'm tired of talking about this, haha. At least some of you understood what I was saying. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Miscellaneous Automotive
Car Electronics & Appearance
Car Performance & Repair
MPG: Speed vs. Time
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list