Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Monkey Pox
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hispls" data-source="post: 8799267" data-attributes="member: 614752"><p>Quick, without looking at your article, name even one of the "experts" responsible for that paper. Tell us about their credentials and how you have verified that they're an "expert" on anything except manipulating statistics. Do any of these "experts" have a conflict of interest like, for example, they're affiliated or funded by drug companies who have sold 100 BILLION dollars worth of their experimental injections? </p><p></p><p>When did I say I'm taking medical advice from him?</p><p></p><p>When did I say that? I'm perfectly willing to review and consider the results of any clinical trials they have performed. You have failed to produce any. </p><p></p><p>Because somehow a medical procedure which has been practiced as far back as 1766 is the same as the safety and efficacy of a new, untested, experimental MRNA gene therapy injection.</p><p> </p><p> Again, how have you verified that whoever is telling you what to believe is an "expert" on anything? What if some other mope here can quote some different "expert" with a different opinion? How will you determine which "expert" to believe?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hispls, post: 8799267, member: 614752"] Quick, without looking at your article, name even one of the "experts" responsible for that paper. Tell us about their credentials and how you have verified that they're an "expert" on anything except manipulating statistics. Do any of these "experts" have a conflict of interest like, for example, they're affiliated or funded by drug companies who have sold 100 BILLION dollars worth of their experimental injections? When did I say I'm taking medical advice from him? When did I say that? I'm perfectly willing to review and consider the results of any clinical trials they have performed. You have failed to produce any. Because somehow a medical procedure which has been practiced as far back as 1766 is the same as the safety and efficacy of a new, untested, experimental MRNA gene therapy injection. Again, how have you verified that whoever is telling you what to believe is an "expert" on anything? What if some other mope here can quote some different "expert" with a different opinion? How will you determine which "expert" to believe? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Monkey Pox
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list