Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ohthexcitement" data-source="post: 5128625" data-attributes="member: 601358"><p>I fully understand your point. I was just refering to the physics behind why it &quot;wouldn&#039;t work&quot; as some said, not how it could work on paper. I am a mechanical engineer, and sadly, could not answer this for myself (I lost a bit of knowlege over the years I guess). I was born into a situation where trial and error was all that I had, then ended up going to school to fix that. There are cases where equasions predict a different outcome than what actually ends up happening. However, the vast majority of physical questions out there can be, at the very least, ball-parked, and running a numbers is free (pending the knowlege of how, of course), whereas trial and error is not. Take into account all equatable variables, and you can get surprizingly close to reality //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="ohthexcitement, post: 5128625, member: 601358"] I fully understand your point. I was just refering to the physics behind why it "wouldn't work" as some said, not how it could work on paper. I am a mechanical engineer, and sadly, could not answer this for myself (I lost a bit of knowlege over the years I guess). I was born into a situation where trial and error was all that I had, then ended up going to school to fix that. There are cases where equasions predict a different outcome than what actually ends up happening. However, the vast majority of physical questions out there can be, at the very least, ball-parked, and running a numbers is free (pending the knowlege of how, of course), whereas trial and error is not. Take into account all equatable variables, and you can get surprizingly close to reality [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification