Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 2937800" data-attributes="member: 555320">It&#039;s not hard to state it properly.Such as;&quot;Using a 4ohm w/ a sensitivity of 87db w/ 100w is the same as using an 8ohm driver w/ a sensitivity of 90db w/ 50w&quot;Had it been stated in that manor, I probably wouldn&#039;t have even responded in the first place //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifMmmm...then I must have misread what you typed.After reading this comment, I have come to realize that by &quot;lower low end capability&quot; that you may have meant &quot;less low end capability&quot;.When I originally read the statement, I read it as &quot;lower low end&quot; referring to the driver extending &quot;lower&quot; (deeper, etc) in frequency and not &quot;lower&quot; as in decreased low end capabilities.Then state it more closely to those statements.I don&#039;t recall anybody doing so in this thread //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gifOriginal poster commented about the decent power handling of the driver...which 200w is a pretty high rating for any midbass driver regardless of impedance.&nbsp; That&#039;s when you came in with the &quot;200w to that driver = 100w to a 4ohm driver&quot;....which isn&#039;t necessarily true and is the statement or theory I think most of the people responding took issue with.&nbsp; You hadn&#039;t used the driver to make the same comparison you did above, and you made no reference to efficiency (which it&#039;s realistically around 87db, no more or less efficient than the drivers I listed previously).So, I guess I&#039;m not sure of how &quot;that myth&quot; was even an issue until you brought it up?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 2937800, member: 555320"] It's not hard to state it [I]properly[/I]. Such as; "Using a 4ohm w/ a sensitivity of 87db w/ 100w is the same as using an 8ohm driver w/ a sensitivity of 90db w/ 50w" Had it been stated in that manor, I probably wouldn't have even responded in the first place [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] Mmmm...then I must have misread what you typed. After reading this comment, I have come to realize that by "lower low end capability" that you may have meant "less low end capability". When I originally read the statement, I read it as "lower low end" referring to the driver extending "lower" (deeper, etc) in frequency and not "lower" as in decreased low end capabilities. Then state it more closely to [I]those[/I] statements. I don't recall anybody doing so in [I]this thread[/I] [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif[/IMG] Original poster commented about the decent power handling of the driver...which 200w is a pretty high rating for any midbass driver regardless of impedance. That's when you came in with the "200w to that driver = 100w to a 4ohm driver"....which isn't necessarily true and is the statement or theory I think most of the people responding took issue with. You hadn't used the driver to make the same comparison you did above, and you made no reference to efficiency (which it's realistically around 87db, no more or less efficient than the drivers I listed previously). So, I guess I'm not sure of how "that myth" was even an issue until [I]you[/I] brought it up? [/QUOTE]

Verification