Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Mag v4 Production complete
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NDMstang65" data-source="post: 4746918" data-attributes="member: 544576"><p>lol whatever dude //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p><p></p><p>You can scream FEA to the death but you'll never be able to explain why those steel shavings form like they did....because your blinded by your own glory and the Wiggins train of thought. Did you ever even think that the same person doing your sub for you is the same one that gave a 1600 watt rating on a 32mm long 4 layer copper coil? Then couldn't figure out why they were all breaking? I guess the acronym DAF means nothing to you as well?</p><p></p><p>Your not an engineer, don't claim to be. I have no engineering degree and I don't claim to be an engineer. I caught you in a blatant line of nothing more than BS with an actual production unit of the same technology of your 'amazing' way of doing things and you didn't like the outcome.</p><p></p><p>I don't pick moot points or BS, i've got no reason to. I put my finger in your 'proof of pudding' because you decided to do a personal attack on me and my knowledge (Had you not done so I would have turned the other way, but You did.) and you didn't like it because I am correct, I have a woofer to prove that I am correct. I have the steel to show that I am correct. If you wish i can break the motor apart and take the pole out of it and show you that the same problem still lies inside of the gap where the coil is...as it does out side of the motor. This is due the plates being dished and not assembled properly. The flux field is not going to change through out the motor. If there is an air gap on the outside there is an air gap on the inside or even in the center of the motor because the plates are dished opposite of each other.</p><p></p><p>The steel shavings formed differently on the outside of two motors with the same technology, by your FEA analysis that is not correct, they should have formed the same exact way. On the XXX it is in a parabolic form, on the 8, it is not. Come now top flight engineering department, you've got to have an explanation for that! Or is it an anomaly of experience with the motors vs. what FEA may say? Did it possibly not take into account that every single one of those plates dish southwards when they are pressed out of the sheet of steel? If i recall it takes in to account and assumes that every single one of the plates is 100% flat and on the same plane with one another, not how they actually are after being produced.</p><p></p><p>You'll need to reflect back on this in the future...mark my words.</p><p></p><p>You can carry on now, thanks for proving my point that the actual production unit can and will differ from what your FEA output may say. It's appreciated as I do not have FEA on this laptop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NDMstang65, post: 4746918, member: 544576"] lol whatever dude [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] You can scream FEA to the death but you'll never be able to explain why those steel shavings form like they did....because your blinded by your own glory and the Wiggins train of thought. Did you ever even think that the same person doing your sub for you is the same one that gave a 1600 watt rating on a 32mm long 4 layer copper coil? Then couldn't figure out why they were all breaking? I guess the acronym DAF means nothing to you as well? Your not an engineer, don't claim to be. I have no engineering degree and I don't claim to be an engineer. I caught you in a blatant line of nothing more than BS with an actual production unit of the same technology of your 'amazing' way of doing things and you didn't like the outcome. I don't pick moot points or BS, i've got no reason to. I put my finger in your 'proof of pudding' because you decided to do a personal attack on me and my knowledge (Had you not done so I would have turned the other way, but You did.) and you didn't like it because I am correct, I have a woofer to prove that I am correct. I have the steel to show that I am correct. If you wish i can break the motor apart and take the pole out of it and show you that the same problem still lies inside of the gap where the coil is...as it does out side of the motor. This is due the plates being dished and not assembled properly. The flux field is not going to change through out the motor. If there is an air gap on the outside there is an air gap on the inside or even in the center of the motor because the plates are dished opposite of each other. The steel shavings formed differently on the outside of two motors with the same technology, by your FEA analysis that is not correct, they should have formed the same exact way. On the XXX it is in a parabolic form, on the 8, it is not. Come now top flight engineering department, you've got to have an explanation for that! Or is it an anomaly of experience with the motors vs. what FEA may say? Did it possibly not take into account that every single one of those plates dish southwards when they are pressed out of the sheet of steel? If i recall it takes in to account and assumes that every single one of the plates is 100% flat and on the same plane with one another, not how they actually are after being produced. You'll need to reflect back on this in the future...mark my words. You can carry on now, thanks for proving my point that the actual production unit can and will differ from what your FEA output may say. It's appreciated as I do not have FEA on this laptop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Mag v4 Production complete
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
