Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="95Prober" data-source="post: 909496" data-attributes="member: 557984">i see. but NOW that means i shouldnt go with the norm of .707 Qtc. coz that is a HIGH value, and therefore makes the box smaller at 0.364 cu.ft, INTERIOR. (i&#039;m supposed to have a final result of 0.364 cu.ft, after the displacement is accounted for).&nbsp;&nbsp; the pioneer site says LOW-Q at 0.6 cu.ft.&nbsp; maybe i shouldnt go under it at 0.364 cu.ft.now after calculating at a .5 Qtc. it does make the box bigger like you said it does. it gives me a 0.85 cu.ft , after the displacement is accounted for.and at .577 Qtc it gives me - 0.573 cu.ftwhat is the lowest Qtc possible that one should go? and which out of the 3 should i go with squeak ??&nbsp; thanks!my numbers i used are these -Fs - 25Qts. - .28VAS - 1.86 cu.ftQtc - will be either .5 OR .577 OR .707</blockquote>

[QUOTE="95Prober, post: 909496, member: 557984"] i see. but NOW that means i shouldnt go with the norm of .707 Qtc. coz that is a HIGH value, and therefore makes the box smaller at 0.364 cu.ft, INTERIOR. (i'm supposed to have a final result of 0.364 cu.ft, after the displacement is accounted for). the pioneer site says LOW-Q at 0.6 cu.ft. maybe i shouldnt go under it at 0.364 cu.ft. now after calculating at a .5 Qtc. it does make the box bigger like you said it does. it gives me a 0.85 cu.ft , after the displacement is accounted for. and at .577 Qtc it gives me - 0.573 cu.ft what is the lowest Qtc possible that one should go? and which out of the 3 should i go with squeak ?? thanks! my numbers i used are these - Fs - 25 Qts. - .28 VAS - 1.86 cu.ft Qtc - will be either .5 OR .577 OR .707 [/QUOTE]

Verification