Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="T3mpest" data-source="post: 2228652" data-attributes="member: 560148"><p>than a XXX?&nbsp; Wow, boners FTW<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />&nbsp;&nbsp; XXX would do fine for a SQ sub, I&#039;ve been told they sound just like brahmas from people who&#039;ve compared both, in which case it will be fine.&nbsp; Most intalls XXX&#039;s are in AREN&#039;T SQ oriented.&nbsp; Which is probably the issue. Frankly a sub with 34mm of xmax and a linear tech. is the very definition of SQL in my book.&nbsp; Try a smallish box, aim for a qtc of .9 or so, none of that ported at 30hz bs, which is where I&#039;d say the XXX get&#039;s it&#039;s not quite a SQ sub rep from.&nbsp; You&#039;ll need quite a bit of power though. A clean 1500-2000 watts would be ideal. Other good options are IDMAX (personal fave), w6&#039;s, FI Q, RL-P,&nbsp; brahma IV.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="T3mpest, post: 2228652, member: 560148"] than a XXX? Wow, boners FTW:rolleyes: XXX would do fine for a SQ sub, I've been told they sound just like brahmas from people who've compared both, in which case it will be fine. Most intalls XXX's are in AREN'T SQ oriented. Which is probably the issue. Frankly a sub with 34mm of xmax and a linear tech. is the very definition of SQL in my book. Try a smallish box, aim for a qtc of .9 or so, none of that ported at 30hz bs, which is where I'd say the XXX get's it's not quite a SQ sub rep from. You'll need quite a bit of power though. A clean 1500-2000 watts would be ideal. Other good options are IDMAX (personal fave), w6's, FI Q, RL-P, brahma IV. [/QUOTE]

Verification