Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Lms r 15?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="T3mpest" data-source="post: 7241074" data-attributes="member: 560148"><p>effects of LE is not visible at all frequencies. inductance causes the coil to act as a LPF, below a given frequency based on how high the LE is, there would be no difference. The LMS-R really shouldn't begin to roll-off until about 100hz or so according to winisd, that's good enough for most ppl. If you were going to cross it at the standard 80hz or lower then it's a non isssue. Honetly inductance modulation is more important than a static LE number. THe LMS employs shorting rings though so it should be good in that respect. With a little EQ getting it to play higher should be possible. In most trunks output TANKS by 200hz anyway due to the back seats and what not absorbing too much sound.. If he just wants loud and low then a LMS would be an awesome choice, they are still very musical from what I understand, T/S paramerters certainly point to them being musical in boxes that woudl work in alot of cars...</p><p></p><p>WIth all this said my subs have a lower inductance than many midranges (.2mh for the FTMFW flat response up to 2000hz)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="T3mpest, post: 7241074, member: 560148"] effects of LE is not visible at all frequencies. inductance causes the coil to act as a LPF, below a given frequency based on how high the LE is, there would be no difference. The LMS-R really shouldn't begin to roll-off until about 100hz or so according to winisd, that's good enough for most ppl. If you were going to cross it at the standard 80hz or lower then it's a non isssue. Honetly inductance modulation is more important than a static LE number. THe LMS employs shorting rings though so it should be good in that respect. With a little EQ getting it to play higher should be possible. In most trunks output TANKS by 200hz anyway due to the back seats and what not absorbing too much sound.. If he just wants loud and low then a LMS would be an awesome choice, they are still very musical from what I understand, T/S paramerters certainly point to them being musical in boxes that woudl work in alot of cars... WIth all this said my subs have a lower inductance than many midranges (.2mh for the FTMFW flat response up to 2000hz) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Lms r 15?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list