Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
listen to this bullsh*t story!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zane" data-source="post: 25330" data-attributes="member: 540617"><p>There is a fine line with probable cause however too. IF the officer has probable cause, which in this case-he did; the officer can inspect and completely search your vehicle. Reason being- the officer suspects that you may be in violation of the law; hence the term "probable cause." Since it is the officers duty to uphold the law, that is what gives him the right. The fourth Amendment to the Constitution clearly states the following:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Noted there the main point in this fine line. No where in this amendment does it say that police may destroy or inflict damage upon civilian property- even with probable cause. In your case, you are due your damaged property replaced. However, the officer was also acting in accordance to the law up to that point.</p><p></p><p>I see no legal reason why your property was wrongfully damaged, when it could have easily been disassembled properly by the officer and still inspected to the same extent and resolve. Good Luck with your lawyer. In My opinion, based on my legal knowledge, you have nothing to worry about further.</p><p></p><p>take it easy,</p><p></p><p>-zane</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zane, post: 25330, member: 540617"] There is a fine line with probable cause however too. IF the officer has probable cause, which in this case-he did; the officer can inspect and completely search your vehicle. Reason being- the officer suspects that you may be in violation of the law; hence the term "probable cause." Since it is the officers duty to uphold the law, that is what gives him the right. The fourth Amendment to the Constitution clearly states the following: Noted there the main point in this fine line. No where in this amendment does it say that police may destroy or inflict damage upon civilian property- even with probable cause. In your case, you are due your damaged property replaced. However, the officer was also acting in accordance to the law up to that point. I see no legal reason why your property was wrongfully damaged, when it could have easily been disassembled properly by the officer and still inspected to the same extent and resolve. Good Luck with your lawyer. In My opinion, based on my legal knowledge, you have nothing to worry about further. take it easy, -zane [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
listen to this bullsh*t story!!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list