Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6495985" data-attributes="member: 549629">Of all the subsequent replies so far (no offense to anyone elses replies heh), I find this one the most interesting. Even James Bang can show his willingness to publish the truth. James has been one of the most outspoken people against Ant on these topics, yet takes the time to correct a statement that, intentionally or unintentionally, cast Ant&#039;s action in an artificially poor light. Yes it was a poor decision on Ant&#039;s part, but its also correct to say it was not a bug put into anyone&#039;s computer, merely an add-on to the forum itself. The reason this is worth mentioning is he utilized a tool you only fell victim to if you chose to enter his privately owned site. I will leave the decision as to whether this affects people&#039;s judgment of his action up to each individual, but clearing up that fact is important.I honestly dont believe either side wants to perpetrate false information. So maybe if the discussion is handled in a mature and honest way, on both sides, all (okay, most) of us can come to some sort of understanding of the other side&#039;s perspective. Both sides have legit gripes, and both sides deserve to be heard in a fair manner.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6495985, member: 549629"] Of all the subsequent replies so far (no offense to anyone elses replies heh), I find this one the most interesting. Even James Bang can show his willingness to publish the truth. James has been one of the most outspoken people against Ant on these topics, yet takes the time to correct a statement that, intentionally or unintentionally, cast Ant's action in an artificially poor light. Yes it was a poor decision on Ant's part, but its also correct to say it was not a bug put into anyone's computer, merely an add-on to the forum itself. The reason this is worth mentioning is he utilized a tool you only fell victim to if you chose to enter his privately owned site. I will leave the decision as to whether this affects people's judgment of his action up to each individual, but clearing up that fact is important. I honestly dont believe either side wants to perpetrate false information. So maybe if the discussion is handled in a mature and honest way, on both sides, all (okay, most) of us can come to some sort of understanding of the other side's perspective. Both sides have legit gripes, and both sides deserve to be heard in a fair manner. [/QUOTE]

Verification