Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Kicker All The Way
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6546893" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Yes, you are confusing the two. The discussion has revolved around speaker tech, while you cite enclosure specifics and install variances. Criteria that are irrelevant to the topic: speaker tech. The discussion has been about speaker tech, and your comments are based on install quality. It simply doesnt take an expert in the field to see install quality is an outside factor to the topic. Signal degradation 'has a lot to do with how the speaker will perform'... does this mean in a discussion on speaker tech we should be discussing signal strength or clipped signal sources? No.</p><p>As for your your assessment of new technologies, BL optimization is one good example. A much more vast example of tech improvement than your example of glue advancements, which i suspect is a guess at best. JL Audio burst on to the scene with BL optimization in the form of several new patent warranted techs with the W7, while a small tiny internet company called Adire Audio simplified things with xbl^2. Several variations have sprung forth since, mostly adopted by... you guessed it, 'small internet companies'. JBL is the largest manufacturer Im aware of to embrace BL optimization (on GTi's), and its adoption was hardly ground breaking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6546893, member: 549629"] Yes, you are confusing the two. The discussion has revolved around speaker tech, while you cite enclosure specifics and install variances. Criteria that are irrelevant to the topic: speaker tech. The discussion has been about speaker tech, and your comments are based on install quality. It simply doesnt take an expert in the field to see install quality is an outside factor to the topic. Signal degradation 'has a lot to do with how the speaker will perform'... does this mean in a discussion on speaker tech we should be discussing signal strength or clipped signal sources? No. As for your your assessment of new technologies, BL optimization is one good example. A much more vast example of tech improvement than your example of glue advancements, which i suspect is a guess at best. JL Audio burst on to the scene with BL optimization in the form of several new patent warranted techs with the W7, while a small tiny internet company called Adire Audio simplified things with xbl^2. Several variations have sprung forth since, mostly adopted by... you guessed it, 'small internet companies'. JBL is the largest manufacturer Im aware of to embrace BL optimization (on GTi's), and its adoption was hardly ground breaking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Kicker All The Way
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list