Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Warbleed" data-source="post: 2627471" data-attributes="member: 549898">lol. You don&#039;t even know what you are talking about kid. I never said the 1008 was a crappy fart box sub, but thats the ONLY thing it&#039;s going to best the RE 8 at.Displacement dictates linear output. The 1008 has less displacement, thus, less linear output, and higher overall distortion.Honestly, if you think one DD 1008 will even come close to the linear output of TWO RE 8s (remember, that&#039;s what our rabid dd fan above claimed), you are a fool, and you honestly don&#039;t understand how speakers work at all.Since you&#039;re too simple minded to realize you made a strawman out of what I ACTUALLY said, and then attempted to argue against that point, has if that was actually the point I made. Let&#039;s break down your brilliant 3rd grade educated &quot;logic&quot; (I use the term loosely in this context):My claim:The only thing that the DD 1008 bests the RE 8 at is at bass farting.Your incorrect and grossly inaccurate misinterpretation of my claim:The only thing the DD 1008 is good at is bass farting.See that? &quot;Only thing the DD is BETTER than the RE at is bass farting&quot; vs. &quot;The DD is only good at bass farting&quot;You&#039;re feeble little mind confused the two, because you don&#039;t know how to think like an intelligent, rational person. I felt it was necessary to expose the failures in reasoning that occurred within your worthless head, for my own amusement and for the amusement of everyone else here, as well as to point out what I did, and what I most certainly did NOT say.Thanks for playing kid, you just got owned.P.S. It&#039;s you&#039;re, which is short for you are, not your, which is the possessive form. Learn to English.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Warbleed, post: 2627471, member: 549898"] lol. You don't even know what you are talking about kid. I never said the 1008 was a crappy fart box sub, but thats the ONLY thing it's going to best the RE 8 at. Displacement dictates linear output. The 1008 has less displacement, thus, less linear output, and higher overall distortion. Honestly, if you think one DD 1008 will even come close to the linear output of TWO RE 8s (remember, that's what our rabid dd fan above claimed), you are a fool, and you honestly don't understand how speakers work at all. Since you're too simple minded to realize you made a strawman out of what I ACTUALLY said, and then attempted to argue against that point, has if that was actually the point I made. Let's break down your brilliant 3rd grade educated "logic" (I use the term loosely in this context): My claim: The only thing that the DD 1008 bests the RE 8 at is at bass farting. Your incorrect and grossly inaccurate misinterpretation of my claim: The only thing the DD 1008 is good at is bass farting. See that? "Only thing the DD is BETTER than the RE at is bass farting" vs. "The DD is only good at bass farting" You're feeble little mind confused the two, because you don't know how to think like an intelligent, rational person. I felt it was necessary to expose the failures in reasoning that occurred within your worthless head, for my own amusement and for the amusement of everyone else here, as well as to point out what I did, and what I most certainly did NOT say. Thanks for playing kid, you just got owned. P.S. It's you're, which is short for you are, not your, which is the possessive form. Learn to English. [/QUOTE]

Verification