Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Just to clear things up a bit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vermithrax" data-source="post: 5666361" data-attributes="member: 580386"><p>DevilDriver:</p><p></p><p>I agree that there's a huge difference, to a point. I don't see science as a far more probable belief but rather just another possibility.</p><p></p><p>I also agree that the beliefs are oppisites. In religion, a deity is the supreme being, the end results of his finished word and work are considered infallible and worthy of ultimate respect, and belief is based on having faith that it is right.</p><p></p><p>In science, man is cast in the role and belief is based on having faith that it is right. I put it that way because history shows that scientific theories are accepted for decades at a time until a new genius emerges with a new theory which shoots down the previous belief. I'll cite the race to absolute 0 as an example.</p><p></p><p>For that line of reasoning I can't see science as a more probable belief since I'd have to resolve myself to accept that I may die believing in something that isn't at all right. The same holds true for religion and that's where I feel that the basis of faith draws the two closer together in practice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vermithrax, post: 5666361, member: 580386"] DevilDriver: I agree that there's a huge difference, to a point. I don't see science as a far more probable belief but rather just another possibility. I also agree that the beliefs are oppisites. In religion, a deity is the supreme being, the end results of his finished word and work are considered infallible and worthy of ultimate respect, and belief is based on having faith that it is right. In science, man is cast in the role and belief is based on having faith that it is right. I put it that way because history shows that scientific theories are accepted for decades at a time until a new genius emerges with a new theory which shoots down the previous belief. I'll cite the race to absolute 0 as an example. For that line of reasoning I can't see science as a more probable belief since I'd have to resolve myself to accept that I may die believing in something that isn't at all right. The same holds true for religion and that's where I feel that the basis of faith draws the two closer together in practice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Just to clear things up a bit
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list