Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="beerman" data-source="post: 1051837" data-attributes="member: 561845">Out: I was going to add a double-baffle option, but it won&#039;t work the way I originally intended. I have to change boatloads of code for it to work properly. So that&#039;s out for V3. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gifIn: user-inputs port area as opposed to a high-spl option. People are asking for flexibility.In: help newbies make box design decisions. Input t/s parameters, spit out maximally flat alignment. User can also select a compact alignment that stays relatively flat (only +1.25db over flat) , but makes a smaller, higher-tuned enclosure. The emails asking &quot;what box for this woofer&quot; are starting to increase. Gotta automate myself out of volunteer work. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gifPossible: Front View, including woofer and port placement, along with magnet assemblies inside the box. This will require that I ask for woofer diameter/shape and the number of woofers. (That&#039;s quite a bit of work, that&#039;s why it&#039;s only &quot;possible&quot;.)Possible: help users determine where they should tune a woofer for a specific volume based on T/S parameters. Not much work, but not much value, either.Possible: minimum port area based on cone excursion x cone area (assuring user that port velocity will never exceed 17m/s). This requires more input on the part of the end user, but will result in a smoother response at high SPL.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="beerman, post: 1051837, member: 561845"] Out: I was going to add a double-baffle option, but it won't work the way I originally intended. I have to change boatloads of code for it to work properly. So that's out for V3. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif[/IMG] In: user-inputs port area as opposed to a high-spl option. People are asking for flexibility. In: help newbies make box design decisions. Input t/s parameters, spit out maximally flat alignment. User can also select a compact alignment that stays relatively flat (only +1.25db over flat) , but makes a smaller, higher-tuned enclosure. The emails asking "what box for this woofer" are starting to increase. Gotta automate myself out of volunteer work. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] Possible: Front View, including woofer and port placement, along with magnet assemblies inside the box. This will require that I ask for woofer diameter/shape and the number of woofers. (That's quite a bit of work, that's why it's only "possible".) Possible: help users determine where they should tune a woofer for a specific volume based on T/S parameters. Not much work, but not much value, either. Possible: minimum port area based on cone excursion x cone area (assuring user that port velocity will never exceed 17m/s). This requires more input on the part of the end user, but will result in a smoother response at high SPL. [/QUOTE]

Verification