Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
IS there a major difference between 2-Way And 3-Way??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HCCA" data-source="post: 2274445" data-attributes="member: 571196"><p>3-ways, in the past, have generally been the best of both worlds. Great transient response with better low end extension. Two ways were either one, or the other. The 4" mids had great transient response, but poor low end extension. 5.25" were a good compramise between 4", and 6.5". 6.5's usually had good low end extension, but y0u could hear a slight, to very noticeable muddiness to the upper mid frequencies. Some pulled it off...most didn't. MB Quart had done a geat job with their 6.5" two ways. I had stayed with 5.25"...until recently. The Boston Acoustics Pro 60's have done a great job using a neodynium magnet for the woofer! Not just the tweeter. This allows them greater motor magnet strength to help with transient response. I don't want to bore with tons of useless detail. The end result is a two way that works as well as a 3 way, but using less space, and fewer parts.</p><p></p><p>3-way systems are tough to find proper mounting locations for, anyway. Heck, as far as that goes, I prefer coaxial mounting. BTW, I got me B/A Pro 60's for $265, on line. And, they sound <em>Sweeeet!</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HCCA, post: 2274445, member: 571196"] 3-ways, in the past, have generally been the best of both worlds. Great transient response with better low end extension. Two ways were either one, or the other. The 4" mids had great transient response, but poor low end extension. 5.25" were a good compramise between 4", and 6.5". 6.5's usually had good low end extension, but y0u could hear a slight, to very noticeable muddiness to the upper mid frequencies. Some pulled it off...most didn't. MB Quart had done a geat job with their 6.5" two ways. I had stayed with 5.25"...until recently. The Boston Acoustics Pro 60's have done a great job using a neodynium magnet for the woofer! Not just the tweeter. This allows them greater motor magnet strength to help with transient response. I don't want to bore with tons of useless detail. The end result is a two way that works as well as a 3 way, but using less space, and fewer parts. 3-way systems are tough to find proper mounting locations for, anyway. Heck, as far as that goes, I prefer coaxial mounting. BTW, I got me B/A Pro 60's for $265, on line. And, they sound [I]Sweeeet![/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
IS there a major difference between 2-Way And 3-Way??
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list