Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
I'm addicted... (TC or SI?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lilmaniac2" data-source="post: 2785034" data-attributes="member: 565395"><p>i dont follow the tc stuff that closely, but the ti and ti pro were eclipse drivers if im not mistaken, i may be not for sure, but if i am right it amazes me how tc could produce a driver for a OEM customer, but couldn't get it right on there own drivers, I mean after all before the titanium cones tc was putting eclipse cones on there subs. Which is another reason i dislike TC, cutting the legs out from under there OEMs like SoundSplinter and Eclipse, I wonder if Eclipse knows of the drivers tc sold with the OEM parts that Eclipse probably paid for. Ill go one step further and even say that this is a regular practice it seems for tc because i know they were selling the claw baskets from the old mags that I'd venture to say were paid for by Stereo Integrity.</p><p></p><p>I wonder why Si doesnt use TC as a buildhouse any more //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p><p></p><p>and im not sure of the model number on the sub i saw with the titanium cone fail, but im 100% positive that it was a new TC sub with the NEW titanium cone</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lilmaniac2, post: 2785034, member: 565395"] i dont follow the tc stuff that closely, but the ti and ti pro were eclipse drivers if im not mistaken, i may be not for sure, but if i am right it amazes me how tc could produce a driver for a OEM customer, but couldn't get it right on there own drivers, I mean after all before the titanium cones tc was putting eclipse cones on there subs. Which is another reason i dislike TC, cutting the legs out from under there OEMs like SoundSplinter and Eclipse, I wonder if Eclipse knows of the drivers tc sold with the OEM parts that Eclipse probably paid for. Ill go one step further and even say that this is a regular practice it seems for tc because i know they were selling the claw baskets from the old mags that I'd venture to say were paid for by Stereo Integrity. I wonder why Si doesnt use TC as a buildhouse any more [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] and im not sure of the model number on the sub i saw with the titanium cone fail, but im 100% positive that it was a new TC sub with the NEW titanium cone [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
I'm addicted... (TC or SI?)
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list