Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
ID this sub...Pics..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 2381105" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>God, not this again.</p><p></p><p>XXX is NOT an SPL sub, its an SQL sub. You know, one that gets 90% as loud as an SPL sub while maintaining very good SQ. The SX is what RE called their 'street beater', basically made as a loud dailydriver sub that retains 'good' SQ. The SX has been shown to burp louder than the XXX, but the test criteria has been debated back and forth. My conclusion? The XXX was not receiving its ideal power (needed more) while the SX was (just about all it could handle). But, even given that, the SX does have a notorious peak in output, that when coupled with the enclosure's tuning point and the vehicle's resonant freq, can be quite loud.</p><p></p><p>Where the debate usually turns nasty is when people assume this means the SX is 'louder', period... its not. It peaks louder, but playing a full frequency spectrum the subs would endure while playing music, the XXX has alot more displacement potential and will be louder on average.</p><p></p><p>Hope that clears that up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 2381105, member: 549629"] God, not this again. XXX is NOT an SPL sub, its an SQL sub. You know, one that gets 90% as loud as an SPL sub while maintaining very good SQ. The SX is what RE called their 'street beater', basically made as a loud dailydriver sub that retains 'good' SQ. The SX has been shown to burp louder than the XXX, but the test criteria has been debated back and forth. My conclusion? The XXX was not receiving its ideal power (needed more) while the SX was (just about all it could handle). But, even given that, the SX does have a notorious peak in output, that when coupled with the enclosure's tuning point and the vehicle's resonant freq, can be quite loud. Where the debate usually turns nasty is when people assume this means the SX is 'louder', period... its not. It peaks louder, but playing a full frequency spectrum the subs would endure while playing music, the XXX has alot more displacement potential and will be louder on average. Hope that clears that up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
ID this sub...Pics..
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list