Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="newusername" data-source="post: 5745715" data-attributes="member: 562064">I think a large radiating surface area is always preferable to extended linear excursion, but also is often impractical for the output we are seeking.  We can't use huge 20 cubic foot enclosures, so we sacrifice efficiency to achieve the smaller enclosure, then make up the difference in output with stroke and power.In a vehicle, I think a Q of 0.6 to the high 0.7's is appropriate; higher Q than that would be more appropriate for the house (although you can make electronic modifications as necessary with the inherent disadvantages associated with that).  If you're stuck to a 10" size (perhaps because of mounting diameter limitations), then you'll probably want to make up for that with a few 10" drivers, or a single 10" with considerable stroke.</blockquote>

Top