Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5dollapizza" data-source="post: 6352381" data-attributes="member: 605714">wow i really didn&#039;t expect to get this many quality responses to my question.&nbsp; thanks all.wouldn&#039;t this cause more issues that just the original 3k-3.2k? meaning those may be more in phase, but wouldn&#039;t the other frequencies that were previously in phase now be out?and yes, it sounds great to me, but i&#039;m always on a quest for better.&nbsp; i&#039;m sure anyone who&#039;s on this site can appreciate that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif&nbsp;activei&#039;m using the system to start with a completely flat and in phase base, then i&#039;ll tune to my liking from there.&nbsp; i&#039;m mostly using this to &quot;train&quot; my ear as to what a perfectly time aligned and flat eq should sound like, and running into issues along the way.&nbsp; sorry i forgot to include that in the original post.i really haven&#039;t played with the actual polarity much of the tweeters, i assumed if i was only having issues with a specific set frequency and not all frequencies that flipping one would have an adverse effect. maybe i&#039;m thinking about this all wrong, and, if so, would love for someone to explain this to me.yes this is what it was in the passives, so it&#039;s what i started around.&nbsp; however, even with moving the xover above and below the problem frequencies, i still get the same issue, which is why i was thinking i would need something external to tune.funny you should say that (the Fletcher-Munson theory).&nbsp; this is actually the reason why i hooked up my car to the system in the first place.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="5dollapizza, post: 6352381, member: 605714"] wow i really didn't expect to get this many quality responses to my question. thanks all. wouldn't this cause more issues that just the original 3k-3.2k? meaning those may be more in phase, but wouldn't the other frequencies that were previously in phase now be out? and yes, it sounds great to me, but i'm always on a quest for better. i'm sure anyone who's on this site can appreciate that [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] active i'm using the system to start with a completely flat and in phase base, then i'll tune to my liking from there. i'm mostly using this to "train" my ear as to what a perfectly time aligned and flat eq should sound like, and running into issues along the way. sorry i forgot to include that in the original post. i really haven't played with the actual polarity much of the tweeters, i assumed if i was only having issues with a specific set frequency and not all frequencies that flipping one would have an adverse effect. maybe i'm thinking about this all wrong, and, if so, would love for someone to explain this to me. yes this is what it was in the passives, so it's what i started around. however, even with moving the xover above and below the problem frequencies, i still get the same issue, which is why i was thinking i would need something external to tune. funny you should say that (the Fletcher-Munson theory). this is actually the reason why i hooked up my car to the system in the first place. [/QUOTE]

Verification