Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="n8skow" data-source="post: 8198615" data-attributes="member: 610656">I&#039;m just trying to be clear on what you are eluding to, or rather - what your basing your statement on. This really would be a more valuable discussion if you&#039;d just come out with whatever evidence you have that squares are so horrible a design - I&#039;d sincerely be interested to know.&nbsp; I&#039;m a terrible mind reader, and don&#039;t know the extent of your experience with squares...I have used (and abused) squares since 2001 (and soloX&#039;s specifically since 2006ish) - and the shape of the cone has never been a limiting mechanical factor (more-so bottoming out the former with the relatively modest xmax and too much port area combined with a good amount of power). I&#039;ve burnt up a few coils - I&#039;ve burnt up a few tinsel leads - I&#039;ve even thrown a former out of the gap (L5&#039;s), but none of these issues have been related to the shape of the cone.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="n8skow, post: 8198615, member: 610656"] I'm just trying to be clear on what you are eluding to, or rather - what your basing your statement on. This really would be a more valuable discussion if you'd just come out with whatever evidence you have that squares are so horrible a design - I'd sincerely be interested to know. I'm a terrible mind reader, and don't know the extent of your experience with squares... I have used (and abused) squares since 2001 (and soloX's specifically since 2006ish) - and the shape of the cone has never been a limiting mechanical factor (more-so bottoming out the former with the relatively modest xmax and too much port area combined with a good amount of power). I've burnt up a few coils - I've burnt up a few tinsel leads - I've even thrown a former out of the gap (L5's), but none of these issues have been related to the shape of the cone. [/QUOTE]

Verification