Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
holy shift
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7256159" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Ah, thanks for the update (I still havent checked the news).</p><p></p><p>Chernobyl was a dry pile, the cooling mechanism is literally just a giant pile of carbon blocks with the rods stuck in them. A dry pile can only cool so much. Once the pile is saturated with heat and the rods are still getting hotter, a meltdown in impossible to stop. But US built reactors use water for cooling. Assuming power is present, you can always pump in fresh water to continually renew the cooling process. Its much, much harder to have a meltdown in a wet reactor than in a dry pile. Usually the worst that will happen with a wet reactor is off-gassing of radioactive steam, to relieve pressure build up from the water evaporating while cooling the rods. This off-gassing is bad, but its a lot better than a Chernobyl style meltdown.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7256159, member: 549629"] Ah, thanks for the update (I still havent checked the news). Chernobyl was a dry pile, the cooling mechanism is literally just a giant pile of carbon blocks with the rods stuck in them. A dry pile can only cool so much. Once the pile is saturated with heat and the rods are still getting hotter, a meltdown in impossible to stop. But US built reactors use water for cooling. Assuming power is present, you can always pump in fresh water to continually renew the cooling process. Its much, much harder to have a meltdown in a wet reactor than in a dry pile. Usually the worst that will happen with a wet reactor is off-gassing of radioactive steam, to relieve pressure build up from the water evaporating while cooling the rods. This off-gassing is bad, but its a lot better than a Chernobyl style meltdown. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
holy shift
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list