Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Etac" data-source="post: 5168824" data-attributes="member: 570589">ok i got two boston g1&#039;s.. i built a sealed box for them going by recommended size.. 1 cubic foot per speaker..so anyway i built the box, and granted i dont have a real amp for them yet.. but i did hook up 400 watts or so to them.. and they barely move... and arent loud at all..so i modeled the box in winisd... and i come up with a qtc over 1.2... and this just seems to high... going up to 4-5 cubic feet gets me to .8-.9 qtc which is better... but everywhere&nbsp; i read ppl say not to make such a large sealed box... but this sub seems to have a pretty stiff suspension, and maybe this wouldnt be such a bad thing?anyway here are the specs.. if anyone wants to mess around and tell me what box they would make for it. i would appreciate it.fs: 26re: 1.75qms: 10.4qes: .57qts: .54vas: 112 Lmms: 137 gcms: 275xmax: 10.5xmech (one way): 22sd: 520 cm2bl: 8.27spl 87.4@ 1w - 94 @ 2.83</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Etac, post: 5168824, member: 570589"] ok i got two boston g1's.. i built a sealed box for them going by recommended size.. 1 cubic foot per speaker.. so anyway i built the box, and granted i dont have a real amp for them yet.. but i did hook up 400 watts or so to them.. and they barely move... and arent loud at all.. so i modeled the box in winisd... and i come up with a qtc over 1.2... and this just seems to high... going up to 4-5 cubic feet gets me to .8-.9 qtc which is better... but everywhere i read ppl say not to make such a large sealed box... but this sub seems to have a pretty stiff suspension, and maybe this wouldnt be such a bad thing? anyway here are the specs.. if anyone wants to mess around and tell me what box they would make for it. i would appreciate it. fs: 26 re: 1.75 qms: 10.4 qes: .57 qts: .54 vas: 112 L mms: 137 g cms: 275 xmax: 10.5 xmech (one way): 22 sd: 520 cm2 bl: 8.27 spl 87.4@ 1w - 94 @ 2.83 [/QUOTE]

Verification