Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Immacomputer" data-source="post: 3403007" data-attributes="member: 570419"><p>That's doubtful. It's a really inefficient design. You lose a ton of cone area to gain excursion and at the same time, you highly increase distortion without increasing the coil length. If you compensate by increasing the coil length, you need more motor strength to fight the greater mms and you also increase inductance. You have all these sacrifices to gain some excursion and your increase in displacement isn't even that great due to the loss of cone area so why do it when you can have a more practical design that doesn't have all the compromises?</p></blockquote><p></p>

Top