Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Hey you evolutionists...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newusername" data-source="post: 5991632" data-attributes="member: 562064"><p>The fundamental problem with Pascal's Wager is the context of the god you're wagering on.</p><p></p><p>First, you must identify the suspected qualities of the god you're wagering. The assumption you're making is that god wants you to believe in him, which is an assumption for which we have no evidence; this idea comes from religious dogma, not from logical reasoning. Again, there is no reason to believe that a god that exists likes belief in him any more than he likes wondering about the natural universe.</p><p></p><p>If you're wagering on him using a specific religious dogma, then there is of course the question of whether you've chosen the right one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newusername, post: 5991632, member: 562064"] The fundamental problem with Pascal's Wager is the context of the god you're wagering on. First, you must identify the suspected qualities of the god you're wagering. The assumption you're making is that god wants you to believe in him, which is an assumption for which we have no evidence; this idea comes from religious dogma, not from logical reasoning. Again, there is no reason to believe that a god that exists likes belief in him any more than he likes wondering about the natural universe. If you're wagering on him using a specific religious dogma, then there is of course the question of whether you've chosen the right one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Hey you evolutionists...
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
