Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
hey republicans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Proximity" data-source="post: 7928230" data-attributes="member: 589997"><p>Um, check out the James Bond Fanatic.</p><p></p><p>As for permanent growth, no, the government couldn't keep up forever. But at some point, had the war never happened, the employment would pick up to the point where the government could ease off on it's spending and the private sector would pick up the "slack" left by the government. It is exactly what happened during WWII, except at a much more rapid pace because of the enormous demand the government created for goods of war. Do we agree on that?</p><p></p><p>And, as ****** as it sounds, we lend ourselves money the majority of our dept. That's not to belittle or debt or make it seem unimportant, but it's secondary to reviving our economy. It's also the best deficit reducer, actually. Because a large part of our deficit is due to lower revenues because of the recession.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't buy that comparison. American families don't govern 300 million people. If the government couldn't do anything a family couldn't do, we wouldn't be a nation.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, no! My argument is just that conservatives like to argue that lower taxes on the rich will be good for the economy and higher taxes on them will be bad. History clearly proves this wrong.</p><p></p><p>However, I will say that they both (the "both" being higher taxes &amp; stronger economy) fall back to use of liberal economics.</p><p></p><p>And we've talked about the progressive tax rate thing for so much and gotten nowhere, I won't start down that road again, but I will mention one thing. You talk about truths being in the center of two extremes. I agree completely. However, my views aren't extreme. <span style="font-size: 10px">(I am kind of a hot head, I base my opinions off of facts, but I won't deny that.)</span> The Democrats and Republicans don't represent two extremes. Pure socialism and pure capitalism are the two extremes. The Republicans are a lot closer to being extremists, but the Democrats are in the center. They want a mix of socialism and capitalism, which is the way to succeed. Just something to think about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Proximity, post: 7928230, member: 589997"] Um, check out the James Bond Fanatic. As for permanent growth, no, the government couldn't keep up forever. But at some point, had the war never happened, the employment would pick up to the point where the government could ease off on it's spending and the private sector would pick up the "slack" left by the government. It is exactly what happened during WWII, except at a much more rapid pace because of the enormous demand the government created for goods of war. Do we agree on that? And, as ****** as it sounds, we lend ourselves money the majority of our dept. That's not to belittle or debt or make it seem unimportant, but it's secondary to reviving our economy. It's also the best deficit reducer, actually. Because a large part of our deficit is due to lower revenues because of the recession. I don't buy that comparison. American families don't govern 300 million people. If the government couldn't do anything a family couldn't do, we wouldn't be a nation. Oh, no! My argument is just that conservatives like to argue that lower taxes on the rich will be good for the economy and higher taxes on them will be bad. History clearly proves this wrong. However, I will say that they both (the "both" being higher taxes & stronger economy) fall back to use of liberal economics. And we've talked about the progressive tax rate thing for so much and gotten nowhere, I won't start down that road again, but I will mention one thing. You talk about truths being in the center of two extremes. I agree completely. However, my views aren't extreme. [SIZE=10px](I am kind of a hot head, I base my opinions off of facts, but I won't deny that.)[/SIZE] The Democrats and Republicans don't represent two extremes. Pure socialism and pure capitalism are the two extremes. The Republicans are a lot closer to being extremists, but the Democrats are in the center. They want a mix of socialism and capitalism, which is the way to succeed. Just something to think about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
hey republicans
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list