Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
hey republicans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7928093" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Yes, spending cuts are a crucial element. The problem is, politicians dont want to cut spending (no, not even republicans imo). The US govt is the largest employer in the country (by far), who would vote for someone running on a campaign of ending their cushy job? So, when any discussion of cutting spending occurs, they always portray it in hack 'n slash terms to scare us like removing medicare so our grandparents will die, taking X number of thousands of cops off the street so our mothers will get *****, or removing X number of teachers so our children will grow up ignorant. Where's the discussion about making govt spending more transparent, competent, and efficient? Its no secret working for a govt agency (be it local, state, or federal) means you generally get much better benefits and salary than a comparable private sector job. Like the old joke, how many DOT employees does it take to dig a hole... 4, one to dig it, and 3 to lean against their shovels and watch. Bridges built to nowhere (to satisfy some politicians constituency and get him re-elected), $1200 crescent wrenches for the military, and pork barrel spending... no powerful politician and neither party will truly address those spending issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7928093, member: 549629"] Yes, spending cuts are a crucial element. The problem is, politicians dont want to cut spending (no, not even republicans imo). The US govt is the largest employer in the country (by far), who would vote for someone running on a campaign of ending their cushy job? So, when any discussion of cutting spending occurs, they always portray it in hack 'n slash terms to scare us like removing medicare so our grandparents will die, taking X number of thousands of cops off the street so our mothers will get *****, or removing X number of teachers so our children will grow up ignorant. Where's the discussion about making govt spending more transparent, competent, and efficient? Its no secret working for a govt agency (be it local, state, or federal) means you generally get much better benefits and salary than a comparable private sector job. Like the old joke, how many DOT employees does it take to dig a hole... 4, one to dig it, and 3 to lean against their shovels and watch. Bridges built to nowhere (to satisfy some politicians constituency and get him re-elected), $1200 crescent wrenches for the military, and pork barrel spending... no powerful politician and neither party will truly address those spending issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
hey republicans
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list