Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
hey republicans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flipx99" data-source="post: 7927742" data-attributes="member: 562352"><p>Well, taxes do need to be raised, on everyone. There is no doubt there. It's not a R or D issue, it's a math problem. We'll never pay down the debt if we continue to borrow. The only way we can pay down the debt is through higher taxes.</p><p></p><p>With that said, here is congress's definition of a spending cut</p><p></p><p>"I have a broken widget. I think it will cost $200. I found one on sale for $150. I cut spending by $50"</p><p></p><p>vs.</p><p></p><p>We spent $150.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>I hate a "reduction in planned spending" or better yet, a "reduction in then planned <em>growth</em> of spending" being referred to a spending cut.</p><p></p><p>It wouldn't be true for an American family so why is it true for government.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flipx99, post: 7927742, member: 562352"] Well, taxes do need to be raised, on everyone. There is no doubt there. It's not a R or D issue, it's a math problem. We'll never pay down the debt if we continue to borrow. The only way we can pay down the debt is through higher taxes. With that said, here is congress's definition of a spending cut "I have a broken widget. I think it will cost $200. I found one on sale for $150. I cut spending by $50" vs. We spent $150. --- I hate a "reduction in planned spending" or better yet, a "reduction in then planned [I]growth[/I] of spending" being referred to a spending cut. It wouldn't be true for an American family so why is it true for government. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
hey republicans
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list