Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 5908325" data-attributes="member: 549629">If you have no issue with controlled use, why are you here with your &#039;you are still breaking the law!&#039; attitude? Your no-compromise attitud is what made me quote you and debate you to begin with. Now you want to say you have no issue with controlled recreational use? You lousy troll. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gifYou can have your cute little anecdotes about scraping bowls or smoking as often as cigs, but the scientifically proven fact is cigs and alcohol are both not only mentally addictive, they are also physically addictive. Marijuana is not, in any way, physically addictive. No matter what your quasi-mental/physical-psychosomatic withdrawl theory says. So paint a picture of &#039;potheads&#039; who only live for their next high all you want. The scraping their bowls? Calling every hook up they know? If it was legal, they&#039;d simply drive to the store and buy it, just like beer. And the point is if the roles were reversed, all the symptoms you say exist for a &#039;strung out&#039; pot head, would be much much worse for someone wanting alcohol or cigarettes. Yet we, as a society, have no moral qualms about alcohol or cigarettes being legal. So clearly an argument based on marijuana being addictive (potheads only live for their next high) is total BS created by the media and powers that be, and perpetuated by the media, our govt&#039;s school system, and brain washed people like you. Think for yourself.It obviously already is available to young kids. If anything, legalizing it would bring its use and abuse more out in the open and make it easier to control the abusing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 5908325, member: 549629"] If you have no issue with controlled use, why are you here with your 'you are still breaking the law!' attitude? Your no-compromise attitud is what made me quote you and debate you to begin with. Now you want to say you have no issue with controlled recreational use? You lousy troll. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif[/IMG] You can have your cute little anecdotes about scraping bowls or smoking as often as cigs, but the scientifically proven fact is cigs and alcohol are both not only mentally addictive, they are also physically addictive. Marijuana is not, in any way, physically addictive. No matter what your quasi-mental/physical-psychosomatic withdrawl theory says. So paint a picture of 'potheads' who only live for their next high all you want. The scraping their bowls? Calling every hook up they know? If it was legal, they'd simply drive to the store and buy it, just like beer. And the point is if the roles were reversed, all the symptoms you say exist for a 'strung out' pot head, would be much much worse for someone wanting alcohol or cigarettes. Yet we, as a society, have no moral qualms about alcohol or cigarettes being legal. So clearly an argument based on marijuana being addictive (potheads only live for their next high) is total BS created by the media and powers that be, and perpetuated by the media, our govt's school system, and brain washed people like you. Think for yourself. It obviously already is available to young kids. If anything, legalizing it would bring its use and abuse more out in the open and make it easier to control the abusing. [/QUOTE]

Verification