Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FoxPro5" data-source="post: 6654870" data-attributes="member: 562649">//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gifBy your rationale, we should be matching amp size with speakers and efficiency to efficiency. It&#039;s not a pain in the ***, it&#039;s just the reality of situation. I&#039;ve ran enough &quot;high efficiency&quot; PA drivers to tell you the paper ratings and real world are vastly different for lots of different reasons.That, in no way, is a justification for using them. I have no problem with the B&amp;amp;C neo mag recommendation (I&#039;ve used the 8&#039;s myself and thought they were great) and never said they were undetailed. It&#039;s a different meal to sit down to, that&#039;s all.A 30 wpc RMS amp will make any MR scream to the point of pain. Meaningless.When the MR *should* be used as such, why not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FoxPro5, post: 6654870, member: 562649"] [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif[/IMG] By your rationale, we should be matching amp size with speakers and efficiency to efficiency. It's not a pain in the ***, it's just the reality of situation. I've ran enough "high efficiency" PA drivers to tell you the paper ratings and real world are vastly different for lots of different reasons. That, in no way, is a justification for using them. I have no problem with the B&C neo mag recommendation (I've used the 8's myself and thought they were great) and never said they were undetailed. It's a different meal to sit down to, that's all. A 30 wpc RMS amp will make any MR scream to the point of pain. Meaningless. When the MR *should* be used as such, why not. [/QUOTE]

Verification