Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
have you seen this beast?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 648577" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Actual surface area of the 'cone', be it cone shaped or flat, is irrelevant. A few manufacturers tried to dupe unknowing consumers a few years ago with 'deeper cones for more surface area'. Its complete BS, like NDMstang alluded to, its only the area of the radiating surface that matters. The footprint of the sub's cone if you will. A 12" sub with a flat cone will have the same radiating surface area as a sub that had a cone a mile deep, assuming same size surround etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.sounddomain.com/memberpage/544405/3" target="_blank">http://www.sounddomain.com/memberpage/544405/3</a></p><p></p><p>There's a couple pics of one of my ppi pro flat piston 12's next to my xxx 15's, if you're interested.</p><p></p><p>Alma used special pro 10's that weren't available to the average consumer.</p><p></p><p>Unlike most of today's subs, the ppi pro's were build scaled. As in, the different sized subs used different motor's, like the W7 does today. The pro 12's were nice, but the 15's were the real monster's. I almost bought the 15's, but back then the 12's were very expensive, and the 15's were double that price.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 648577, member: 549629"] Actual surface area of the 'cone', be it cone shaped or flat, is irrelevant. A few manufacturers tried to dupe unknowing consumers a few years ago with 'deeper cones for more surface area'. Its complete BS, like NDMstang alluded to, its only the area of the radiating surface that matters. The footprint of the sub's cone if you will. A 12" sub with a flat cone will have the same radiating surface area as a sub that had a cone a mile deep, assuming same size surround etc. [URL="http://www.sounddomain.com/memberpage/544405/3"]http://www.sounddomain.com/memberpage/544405/3[/URL] There's a couple pics of one of my ppi pro flat piston 12's next to my xxx 15's, if you're interested. Alma used special pro 10's that weren't available to the average consumer. Unlike most of today's subs, the ppi pro's were build scaled. As in, the different sized subs used different motor's, like the W7 does today. The pro 12's were nice, but the 15's were the real monster's. I almost bought the 15's, but back then the 12's were very expensive, and the 15's were double that price. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
have you seen this beast?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list