Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Hair trick
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hispls" data-source="post: 8603941" data-attributes="member: 614752"><p>I like your style.</p><p></p><p>That said, you have wildly shifted the goalposts here. I have already posted (in this thread) picture of an impedance curve of my subs in the box and also the circuit which represents a woofer in a ported box.</p><p></p><p>The only point is that there is nothing true about "longer wavelengths take more power". In fact I have posted an impedance plot showing that my box at least will draw less power below 43hz when compared to 43hz. In fact it shows that the amp will not see the same impedance at any more than 4 specific frequencies but we cannot make any generalizations at all besides saying that at tuning your amp will make the most power regardless of the tuning frequency.</p><p></p><p>You could also make the case that if you want to play extended test tones you'll consume more power over time than more dynamic program material, but that should have been obvious enough to not even warrant discussion and it has to relevance to the topic of the thread since you can levitate hair with enough air particle velocity and turbulence regardless of the length of the tone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hispls, post: 8603941, member: 614752"] I like your style. That said, you have wildly shifted the goalposts here. I have already posted (in this thread) picture of an impedance curve of my subs in the box and also the circuit which represents a woofer in a ported box. The only point is that there is nothing true about "longer wavelengths take more power". In fact I have posted an impedance plot showing that my box at least will draw less power below 43hz when compared to 43hz. In fact it shows that the amp will not see the same impedance at any more than 4 specific frequencies but we cannot make any generalizations at all besides saying that at tuning your amp will make the most power regardless of the tuning frequency. You could also make the case that if you want to play extended test tones you'll consume more power over time than more dynamic program material, but that should have been obvious enough to not even warrant discussion and it has to relevance to the topic of the thread since you can levitate hair with enough air particle velocity and turbulence regardless of the length of the tone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Hair trick
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh